Anyway a bit about the quilt. It was inspired by marks on cloth: this piece of cloth from bought from Jo Lovelock, and a piece of my own indigo arashi shibori dyed brown silk organza. Searching the internet for photos linked with dislocation brought up various MRI scans and X-rays of dislocated bones which these fabrics reminded me of. A few years ago I had a 'mallet injury' of my left hand pinkie and had a sneaky look at my x-rays on the way between hospitals. It was a very peculiar angle and required splinted strapping for 6 weeks. I briefly considered that as a quilt but decided on something more abstract related to it.
I cut up the fabric and rearranged it and after a bit of a search managed to track down the right colour of blue threads to machine stitch with
Once quilted ( I particularly liked the 12wt Wonderfil ) I took photos of the 4 different permutations of the indigo organza over the top, spending quite a while deciding which I liked best.
Deciding how to 'float' the organza over the top was quite a challenge - I tried samples with machine stitching the edges or raw and then decided on hand rolling ( I used to be quite an expert when I made my own scarves from yardage) - time consuming given I was running against a tight deadline but I'm getting to be a bit of a perfectionist. And then I had to work out how to attach it by stitching it into the facing ( the bottom took 3 attempts, 1 too loose, 1 too tight!)
Artist Statement:
Inspired by accidental marks on cloth reminiscent of bone fractures and dislocations revealed through X-rays and MRI scans.
Even with modern scanning techniques, detection depends on the experience and interpretation of the viewer.
Tray-dyed cotton sateen fabric dyed by Jo Lovelock cut up and reassembled, machine stitched with 12wt and 40wt cotton threads. Floating top layer of silk organza with hand-rolled hems, attached at top and bottom, hand-dyed with indigo using arashi shibori.
Mags, commiserations. It is all very well when one rationalises it all, but it still hurts. I so agree with what you say about photographs. I do think that there should be more photos of work than the one whole and one detail. I believe that the serious exhibitions should ask for five photographs. There are so many interesting textile pieces these days that just are not appreciated in restrictive two dimensions.
ReplyDeleteYour piece sounds really interesting.
I can't believe that this wonderful quilt was not chosen! But it happens to the best of us. You could have given it a few more chances in other calls before posting about it on the blog. Perhaps it would have made it into Quilt National!
ReplyDeleteThanks Uta ! I did consider Quilt National but as they're also jurying from photos... Also it's already been posted on the CQ challenge website
ReplyDeleteOh Mags I have been through this dilemma and there is something really soul-destroying about trying to second-guess a)quilt and art show juries and b) the art-buying public.
ReplyDeleteMy advice is to stay true to yourself or you run the risk of stifling your creativity. It was hard realisation to come to but I have felt much freer since I decided to do that.
This comment has been removed by the author.
ReplyDeleteLove the piece and it's a pity it didn't get in. Maybe it wasn't the photography as often quilts are juried in to shows because they provide a cohesive exhibition.
ReplyDeleteThanks for the link to submissions. Truly a fascinating group of quilts to a theme and yes, hard to whittle down. I do think quilts using sheers, especially one where the sheer hangs free, often lose out in photo juroring. You just can't capture what's going on and I doubt the juror realizes what's being depicted. Should you change the direction your art is moving to ensure better consideration in exhibits? I'd say no, but it all depends on what's more important to you, of course.
ReplyDeleteSorry it did not make it in the show. I like it.
ReplyDelete